Peptides for Depression | What to Know in 2024
For decades scientists and doctors have operated under the premise that a “chemical imbalance” is the underlying cause of depression. The prevailing theory has been that if a person’s serotonin, norepinephrine, or dopamine levels were out of balance then that person would develop depression. It seemed logical then that correcting those levels, usually by raising them, was the best way to treat depression.The result of the “chemical imbalance” hypothesis was an explosion of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), like Prozac and Zoloft, in addition to MAOIs, SNRIs, tricyclic antidepressants, and drugs targeting norepinephrine and dopamine levels. In the early 1990s, these drugs were touted as being 80-90% effective in treating depression and related conditions. As a result, they quickly became some of the most-prescribed drugs in the western world. Unfortunately, these wounder drugs were given far more credit than they were due, perhaps in no small part because people and their medical providers were desperate to have anything they could use to fight back against the symptoms of depression.As it turns out, more recent studies have shown that drugs like Prozac are no more effective in treating depression than placebo[1]. For a long time, no one wanted to talk about this because, well, there wasn’t much of an alternative. Over time, however, doctors were forced to face the fact that SSRIs and similar drugs simply weren’t up to the task they were developed for. Far from being a nadir in depression research, however, this revelation spurred the development of new hypotheses and resulted in the investigation of multiple new treatments for depression including peptides, electroconvulsive therapy, and even drugs like ketamine.